I will be the first to admit that I often check out celebrity news websites. But some “celebrities” have no business on legitimate news sites.
These “celebrities” include the parade of mistresses associated with cheating Hollywood.
I read several newspaper website daily. While I won’t name the site I couldn’t help but notice the headline “Blush ‘Bombshell.’”
For a second I thought “no, it can’t be.” I unwilling clicked on the link and to my disappointment saw a photo of the woman who resembles a “dirt bang’s binder from 7th grade metal shop” (Thanks Tina Fey for letting me borrow that joke).
Apparently Michelle “Bombshell” McGee is going to be stripping at a club in Pittsburgh. Why is this tattooed stripper famous? Oh that’s right she was too dumb to realize Jesse James was married to one of my favorite actresses Sandra Bullock. It’s called Google.
So basically because she is a (insert derogatory remark about character here) she gets not just an interview but a question and answer session with the publication. I typically am fond of the work this reporter does. He has covered some real news, such as the Cyril Wecht fraud trial.
Here is an intelligent except:
Q: Tell readers why they should come out and see you at Blush.
A: It’s going to be hot, hello. Boobies and a strip club. How can you go wrong with that? Boobs, tattoos and booze. That’s all you need.
When news sources printing smut like this it legitimizes these “celebrities’” place in the world. Or I can use my less mature argument — Michelle McGee just looks gross and I should not be subjected to see her in a bikini when I go to a news website.
Her 15 minutes has to be up already.